-
Website
http://ericstriffler.tumblr.com -
Original page
http://ericstriffler.tumblr.com/post/44298037 -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
terimeriful
17 comments · 1 points
-
Eric Striffler
27 comments · 2 points
-
chelseaATL
9 comments · 1 points
-
cynthiadupuy
10 comments · 1 points
-
Blaine_Inagaki
24 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Eric Striffler's Blog!
3 weeks ago · 12 comments
-
Signed Christmas Photo - First 100!
3 weeks ago · 11 comments
-
Eric Striffler's Blog!
3 weeks ago · 8 comments
-
Eric Striffler's Blog!
3 weeks ago · 7 comments
-
Eric Striffler's Blog!
3 weeks ago · 2 comments
-
Eric Striffler's Blog!
I think it was a dog, but because of a
long period of time in the water parts of it has been
disolved. It must of been dead for a couple of days before it got
washed up on shore. The poor thing. T-T
that poor thing is dead :[
it looks like a pig/dog/wolf/warthog type thing.
I really hope its fake or something because that is really sad. poor little thing :[
We're tracking the story as it unfolds too, at capturethebeast.blogspot.com. As you can see, we're interested in more than just discovering the truth about this creature--we want to capture one, and we're willing to pay handsomely for it. Let us know if you get any scoops, and we'll do the same!
Oh yeah and it's not a turtle, cause a turtles spine is connected to it's shell, so this would be a spineless turtle if it were real
It makes me sad as well... the poor thing is dead. :(
pink fur on the back hind leg
My video was posted before the story was in the papers or on TV or anything.
thts fuckin nasty. but if u relly look at it nd compare the skelliton of a cat .. it relly ......LOOKS LIKE A DRIED UP CAT. nd yes thr is fur on it.. it jus came off in da water. ..ino this cuz 1time i was walkn by the canal nd i smelled something Very nasty nd i went to go look nd it was a beaver jus laying dead in the water. most of the hair was gone cuz it was in the water too long..so ima have to go with cat..
<img src="http://i105.photobucket.com/albums/m209/DarkDragoonLord/1217474674861.jpg">
<img src="http://i341.photobucket.com/albums/o375/kitty8991/cat.jpg">
there skin get rashes
and this thing has that all, and it looks alot like a pig...
Well i just seen it a while ago on t.v. today(8-1-08) and i was pretty freaked out. I looked at it like WTF!!! It looked like one of those myth creatures like a chupacabra (IDK if i spelled it right). I think thoes mythical creatures are real. But that's not the subject here. This weird washed up crature is freaking everyone out. The government or who ever needs to cut that thing open and do some good research before they make another one cuz they really got us this time. O yea and i do think the government is HIDING A LOT behind closed doors. For example THIS CREATURE, cures for disease's that "they" say isn't curable (bullshit, I have PROOF), and many other things. Soon im going to have a blog or sumthing having all the government secrets exposed because i dont think its right for us to be suffering with these pains or "uncurable" disease's & paying all these damn taxes and not being told the truth.
So to sum it all up, this is a crazy looking creature that i thought wouldn't be real and only in fairy tails, and the GOVERNMENT are big fat LIARS!
Thank You For Reading.
We would have a much easier time if the GENIUS who took these pictures would have put some sort of object in the frame so we could compare the size to it. Like a rock or a dollar bill or something.
And secondly...I'm of the opinion this is almost definitely government related. Even if it's fake, it's probably governmental. Can you IMAGINE the kinds of things running around somewhere that we don't know about? With the science breakthrough of cloning now pretty much "perfected", cloning different species and "combining" those animals' DNA shouldn't really be a problem for our fancy pants government.
It doesn look a lot like a pig. But the thick black/brown fur? Definitely not pig like. Pigs have hair, but not FUR.
The skull is almost definitely canine, as is the tail.
Claiming that is is a species from the sea is almost idiotic; how could this creature survive life in marine conditions? There are no fins, the tail would be worthless when it came to swimming, and unless the creature has webbed feet on it's freaky little monster arms, then maneuvering in the ocean would be pretty impossible.
>.>
If no one has dissected the thing by now, it makes me think "they" either know exactly what it is, or that it is most definitely fake.
WHo knows?
Oh and, they already claimed it to be dead, some kids had the remains in there back yard.
It could possibly be a demon or alien though ?!? If the scientists can't identify its type then this could possibly be on of those forever mysteries :D!
but what if it is some prehistoric creature that lives in the ocean. I mean everyone thought that the giant squid was fake and a couple years ago one of them washed up on the shore. I was looking at the animal and it has legs with what appear to be some kind of hoof which would not function very well if the creature where swimming at the bottom of the ocean for millions of years. Also the long fingers resemble those of a mole. The creature shares many other traits with the mole such as the long snout and the small eyes covered mostly by flesh. There are also many moles that are semi aquatic. This has all led me to the conclusion that this is some sort of "giant mole-like creature that must live underground at the bottom of the sea. This would explain the lack of a physique that would endure a great amount of swimming. This would also explain why one has never been found before, this is because when they die they simply stay underground and decompose. This one could possibly just have been near the surface of the floor and rough currents from a large storm washed it up and onto the shore.
I know this sounds pretty crazy but when i saw this picture i was really entrigued and i stardted to reasearch and i think that my theory is feasable.
-swt-
it looks like a dog of some sort and the beak looks like its skull which has been eroded or worn out by the sea. the fur looks like its been thrashed and ripped off too.
anyway its definitely not a turtle. is there something to gauge the size of this?
<img src=http://chadzilla.typepad.com/chadzilla/images/butcher_shop_022.jpg></img>
And i can just imagen the faces of the person who fliped it over (is some one did) i wouldent dare to go more then three feet close to it.
Any way its very intursting thank you for posting it and the vidio i watched :3
Good luck
-Eachey Wolf
what i would guess: it looks like sombody got really mad or was phyco and poured acid all over their dog. anyway, if that is the case i would pour acid on it's owner.
^^acid+dog=the above^^
no jk kidding but it looks like a dead bore
On my Opinion about it what i see it in the 2 pictures it looks "different" if you know what i mean. I think it could be anything. On the count of that beak which isn't a beak its just the bone after the flesh was wiped completely clean and exposed the bone. That hole is very common in land animal skulls such as horses, dogs, pigs, and so on. I would very much like to hear more about this and certainly would be glad if it turned into something big considering pretty much all the criptotic things have been fake. Please email me for further discotion. Aim: MilitaryManiac77@aol.com also is email.
They don't have front teeth in the upper jaw.
Compare that to the new picture.
You can tell by its muscle and bone structure that it is not a sea creature because all of its arms/ legs and muscles are oriented to lift vertically for walking, not for swimming.
Its arms are decomposed as well, those things that look like fingers are the dog's fingers without the paws, feel a dog's arms above the paws and you'll see what I mean.
Also the testicles are outside the body of the animal which is not found in sea creatures due to many reasons which I'm sure you can think up.
Also the ears are flappy like a dogs. Not really common among sea creatures.
Conclusion: Decomposed and water bloated dog. Most likely discarded by owner. I doubt it was result of testing, they normally dispose of the bodies in labs pretty well. For fear of contamination or spread of disease.
Although I'm confused as to why someone doesn't go and pick up the carcass and examine it if it's getting so much attention.
Link is here: http://www.foxnews.com/images/409924/0_22_monta...
Now the question becomes, who is Loren Coleman? How is s/he involved in this investigation? Is she a Fox News employee? How did she get this picture, and when was it taken?
Mayb a fake after someone saw the other one?
Hmm.. :\
idk you tell me :O
Just look close. Blue from the water loss of fur from sun and look at the snout and front bottom teeth and also the ears! and tail! but most obvious is the body shape and legs.
OPEN YOUR EYES PEOPLE!!! Were not 4 anymore stop making up dragon stories
The complexion gives it away mostly, if they worked on the skin texture and history/aging effects. It would fool more people.
Thanks,
Nikki T.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and u said that thy havnt tuched it and i saw a nother vidio that the other pic was the only one thy took and that the monster was piked up as fast as thy could?
how could have thy taken this pic and look at its mouth its diffrnt now how is it the same monster???
awser me that?
i don't know if its true or not
Or maybe it's the chubacabra who knows? o-0
lllllllllllllllllllloooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnggggggggg!
seriously!!!!!!!!
This is no monster, though I wish it was.
There is no way in hell that it could be a turtle.
Its a part of the turtles body, so it can't just climb out of a shell like a crab or something.
Search around a bit. That's my closest guess.
Interesting story none the less :o)
pictures of your dead corpse
body?
are different
that front part of the "monster", w/e you think is the beak, its actually on it's side so it "appears" to be a beak, but it's not in reality. Also, that brown spot when you look at it's face or upper jaw is the hollow part of a dog's upper mouth.
I really wish it was something cooler though...
:(
kinda like a boar
it might be loch ness lol
but i reckon its a bad experiment
coz if so i do not wanna know what they were making
i own a raccoon his name is Pip so dont tell me its not one so stop dreaming and come back to real life mmkayyyy?
it probably is a partially decomposed pig
look at the ears the belly the eyes the teeth the rotting nose is round the balls
but it is missin hooves
hmm?
Like a mix between a bird(the beak-like snout), some type of land mammal, and some kind of whale xD
(the long arms.)
xD Or maybe it was something from that lab or whatever, it might of got away and drowned.
:P <xD
-EM
So if you ignore the beak and give it a muzzle instead, and look at the shape of the fingers and such, it's a raccoon. It's a rather fat one, but it's a raccoon, or at least an animal very similar to one.
also, i don't think that i s a beak, it looks like it could be part of the skull that was torn off.
hell, for all we know it could be a photoshop of a dead pig, or something.
its clearly not a racoon. i don't know who came up with that idea, but that is just plain ridiculous.
this is a very imoprtant found.
i mean maybe it is a mutation from a nuclear bomb or stone like the tchernobyl thing.
i hope they find the problem.
greetz from germany
=D
before i saw the pictures of the other creatures, I thought this might well be some "prehistoric" creature that has not been discovered yet, but for some reason washes up on shore (as has ahppened on numerous occasions). But that doesn't explain the other creatures
If these things are real, then no doubt they're the result of experiments gone wrong. But would a facility that does testing so secret and illegal, be so careless as to just ditch the creatures into the sea and risk them being found?! Unlikely.
My money would be on these things being completely fake. Notice how they mysteriously disappeared before experts could perform an autopsy. Maybe some people with prop-making experience got a little bored and decided to see how many people they could fool. Maybe it's a marketing ploy. Who knows. But, being a rational person, the idea of actual monsters afoot (or ashore) seems near laughable to me.
is
a
dog
idiots
it honestly looks like a pig/boar
it looks NOTHING like a dog or a raccoon
its body clearly resembles a pig, but it looks like the snout has been torn off or cut off
probably a mishap of the butcher shop
But we wont really know untill the DNA tests are done :D
But if it's not in the system and it's some sort of crazy preostoric animal than I SOOOOOO called it XD
The 2 pictures are of different creatures. Some one wants you to believe that blue thing is the creature below. Get a veterinarian to look.
Either fish ate its nose, or it got scraped off, so there's no beak.
The fur washed off from being in water, dead.
The long fingers are it's bones coming out, they could be broken.
So, it could just be a fat, waterlogged dog that washed up on shore.
Not a monster.
its got like human feet, pig head, wolf teeth, i dont have a clue about the front legs
i think is a human guniea pig gone wrong !!!!!!!
it should be asked about in the new or what not,, i think its a mad scientist experiment!!!:L
Have YOU seen it?
because it might be phoshoped photo of like a dog or something